Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] s390/crypto: Use -ENODEV instead of -EOPNOTSUPP

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 03:33:02PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> s390x crypto is one of the rare modules that returns -EOPNOTSUPP instead of
> -ENODEV in case HW support is not available.
> 
> Convert to -ENODEV, so e.g., systemd's systemd-modules-load.service
> ignores this error properly.
> 
> v2 -> v3:
> - "s390/pkey: Use -ENODEV instead of -EOPNOTSUPP"
> -- Also convert pkey_clr2protkey() as requested by Harald
> - Add r-b's (thanks!)
> 
> v1 -> v2:
> - Include
> -- "s390/crypto: ghash: Use -ENODEV instead of -EOPNOTSUPP"
> -- "s390/crypto: prng: Use -ENODEV instead of -EOPNOTSUPP"
> -- "s390/crypto: sha: Use -ENODEV instead of -EOPNOTSUPP"
> 
> Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Harald Freudenberger <freude@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> David Hildenbrand (4):
>   s390/pkey: Use -ENODEV instead of -EOPNOTSUPP
>   s390/crypto: ghash: Use -ENODEV instead of -EOPNOTSUPP
>   s390/crypto: prng: Use -ENODEV instead of -EOPNOTSUPP
>   s390/crypto: sha: Use -ENODEV instead of -EOPNOTSUPP

Should I pick these up so they can go upstream via the s390 tree?




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux