Re: Re: [PATCH] KVM: s390: fix memory slot handling for KVM_SET_USER_MEMORY_REGION

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 27.05.19 09:39, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 24/05/2019 16.06, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>> kselftests exposed a problem in the s390 handling for memory slots.
>> Right now we only do proper memory slot handling for creation of new
>> memory slots. Neither MOVE, nor DELETION are handled properly. Let us
>> implement those.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++--------------
>>  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
>> index 871d2e99b156..6ec0685ab2c7 100644
>> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
>> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
>> @@ -4525,21 +4525,28 @@ void kvm_arch_commit_memory_region(struct kvm *kvm,
>>  				const struct kvm_memory_slot *new,
>>  				enum kvm_mr_change change)
>>  {
>> -	int rc;
>> +	int rc = 0;
>>  
>> -	/* If the basics of the memslot do not change, we do not want
>> -	 * to update the gmap. Every update causes several unnecessary
>> -	 * segment translation exceptions. This is usually handled just
>> -	 * fine by the normal fault handler + gmap, but it will also
>> -	 * cause faults on the prefix page of running guest CPUs.
>> -	 */
>> -	if (old->userspace_addr == mem->userspace_addr &&
>> -	    old->base_gfn * PAGE_SIZE == mem->guest_phys_addr &&
>> -	    old->npages * PAGE_SIZE == mem->memory_size)
>> -		return;
> 
> This check is now gone in the new code. Maybe mention the reason in the
> patch description?

Yes, all these checks are done in common code (and they result in the KVM_MR types).

> 
>> -	rc = gmap_map_segment(kvm->arch.gmap, mem->userspace_addr,
>> -		mem->guest_phys_addr, mem->memory_size);
>> +	switch (change) {
>> +	case KVM_MR_DELETE:
>> +		rc = gmap_unmap_segment(kvm->arch.gmap, old->base_gfn * PAGE_SIZE,
>> +					old->npages * PAGE_SIZE);
>> +		break;
>> +	case KVM_MR_MOVE:
>> +		rc = gmap_unmap_segment(kvm->arch.gmap, old->base_gfn * PAGE_SIZE,
>> +					old->npages * PAGE_SIZE);
>> +		if (rc)
>> +			break;
>> +		/* FALLTHROUGH */
>> +	case KVM_MR_CREATE:
>> +		rc = gmap_map_segment(kvm->arch.gmap, mem->userspace_addr,
>> +				      mem->guest_phys_addr, mem->memory_size);
>> +		break;
>> +	case KVM_MR_FLAGS_ONLY:
>> +		break;
>> +	default:
>> +		WARN(1, "Unknown KVM MR CHANGE: %d\n", change);
>> +	}
>>  	if (rc)
>>  		pr_warn("failed to commit memory region\n");
>>  	return;
>>
> 
> Looks good to me, but I'm not an expert in this area, so FWIW a weak:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux