On Wed, 15 May 2019 01:42:41 +0200 Eric Farman <farman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > They are based on 5.1.0, not Conny's vfio-ccw tree even though there are > some good fixes pending for 5.2 there. I've run this series both with > and without that code, but couldn't decide which base would provide an > easier time applying patches. "I think" they should apply fine to both, > but I apologize in advance if I guessed wrong! :) Patch 2 stumbled over a trivial-to-fix context change; else, things applied cleanly. Thanks, queued patches 1-4.
