Re: [PATCH v2 3/7] s390: vfio-ap: sysfs interface to display guest CRYCB

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 5/6/19 2:54 AM, Pierre Morel wrote:
On 03/05/2019 23:14, Tony Krowiak wrote:
Introduces a sysfs interface on the matrix mdev device to display the
contents of the shadow of the guest's CRYCB

Signed-off-by: Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  1 file changed, 59 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
index 44a04b4aa9ae..1021466cb661 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
@@ -771,6 +771,64 @@ static ssize_t matrix_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
  }
  static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(matrix);
+static ssize_t guest_matrix_show(struct device *dev,
+                 struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
+{
+    struct mdev_device *mdev = mdev_from_dev(dev);
+    struct ap_matrix_mdev *matrix_mdev = mdev_get_drvdata(mdev);
+    char *bufpos = buf;
+    unsigned long apid;
+    unsigned long apqi;
+    unsigned long apid1;
+    unsigned long apqi1;
+    unsigned long napm_bits;
+    unsigned long naqm_bits;
+    int nchars = 0;
+    int n;
+
+    if (!matrix_mdev->shadow_crycb)
+        return -ENODEV;
+
+    mutex_lock(&matrix_dev->lock);
+    napm_bits = matrix_mdev->shadow_crycb->apm_max + 1;
+    naqm_bits = matrix_mdev->shadow_crycb->aqm_max + 1;
+    apid1 = find_first_bit_inv(matrix_mdev->shadow_crycb->apm, napm_bits); +    apqi1 = find_first_bit_inv(matrix_mdev->shadow_crycb->aqm, naqm_bits);
+
+    if ((apid1 < napm_bits) && (apqi1 < naqm_bits)) {
+        for_each_set_bit_inv(apid, matrix_mdev->shadow_crycb->apm,
+                     napm_bits) {
+            for_each_set_bit_inv(apqi,
+                         matrix_mdev->shadow_crycb->aqm,
+                         naqm_bits) {
+                n = sprintf(bufpos, "%02lx.%04lx\n", apid,
+                        apqi);
+                bufpos += n;
+                nchars += n;
+            }
+        }
+    } else if (apid1 < napm_bits) {
+        for_each_set_bit_inv(apid, matrix_mdev->shadow_crycb->apm,
+                     napm_bits) {
+            n = sprintf(bufpos, "%02lx.\n", apid);
+            bufpos += n;
+            nchars += n;
+        }
+    } else if (apqi1 < naqm_bits) {
+        for_each_set_bit_inv(apqi, matrix_mdev->shadow_crycb->aqm,
+                     naqm_bits) {
+            n = sprintf(bufpos, ".%04lx\n", apqi);
+            bufpos += n;
+            nchars += n;
+        }
+    }
+
+    mutex_unlock(&matrix_dev->lock);
+
+    return nchars;
+}
+static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(guest_matrix);
+
  static struct attribute *vfio_ap_mdev_attrs[] = {
      &dev_attr_assign_adapter.attr,
      &dev_attr_unassign_adapter.attr,
@@ -780,6 +838,7 @@ static struct attribute *vfio_ap_mdev_attrs[] = {
      &dev_attr_unassign_control_domain.attr,
      &dev_attr_control_domains.attr,
      &dev_attr_matrix.attr,
+    &dev_attr_guest_matrix.attr,
      NULL,
  };


Code seems very similar to matrix_show, can't you share the code?

It is, I suppose I could write a function that both can call.










[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux