On Wed, 10 Apr 2019, Michael Ellerman wrote: > Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > On Fri, Apr 05, 2019 at 06:01:36PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote: > >> Thinking about this more, we can shave off the first 4 chars and have it > >> be: > >> > >> spec_mitigations= > >> > >> I think it is painfully clear which speculation mitigations we mean. And > >> the other switches don't have "cpu_" prefixes too so... > > > > Sure, I'm ok with renaming it to that, if there are no objections. > > What about when we have a mitigation for a non-speculation related bug :) Those kind of silicon bugs are usually mitigated unconditionally. Thanks, tglx
