[PATCH 10/12] s390: avoid __builtin_return_address(n) on clang

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



llvm on s390 has problems with __builtin_return_address(n), with n>0,
this results in a somewhat cryptic error message:

fatal error: error in backend: Unsupported stack frame traversal count

To work around it, use the direct return address directly. This
is probably not ideal here, but gets things to compile and should
only lead to inferior reporting, not to misbehavior of the generated
code.

Link: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41424
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
---
 arch/s390/include/asm/ftrace.h | 5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/ftrace.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/ftrace.h
index 5a3c95b11952..7923c63946fb 100644
--- a/arch/s390/include/asm/ftrace.h
+++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/ftrace.h
@@ -13,7 +13,12 @@
 
 #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_CC_IS_CLANG
+/* https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41424 */
+#define ftrace_return_address(n) __builtin_return_address(0)
+#else
 #define ftrace_return_address(n) __builtin_return_address(n)
+#endif
 
 void _mcount(void);
 void ftrace_caller(void);
-- 
2.20.0




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux