On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 8:55 AM Masahiro Yamada
<yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 4:33 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 7:11 AM Masahiro Yamada
> > <yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > I do not know why to reproduce it,
> > > but is "__init __noreturn" more sensible than
> > > "__always_inline" here?
> >
> > It's in a header file, so it has to be 'inline'. We could make it
> > static inline __init __noreturn,
>
> Yes, I like 'static inline __init __noreturn'
>
> > but I don't see an advantage over
> > __always_inline there.
>
> __always_inline takes away the compiler's freedom.
>
> I'd like to leave it up to the compiler where possible.
Ok, fair enough.
Arnd
