Re: [PATCH v4 5/7] s390: ap: implement PAPQ AQIC interception in kernel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 04/03/2019 02:57, Halil Pasic wrote:
On Fri, 22 Feb 2019 16:29:58 +0100
Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

We register the AP PQAP instruction hook during the open
of the mediated device. And unregister it on release.

In the AP PQAP instruction hook, if we receive a demand to
enable IRQs,
- we retrieve the vfio_ap_queue based on the APQN we receive
   in REG1,
- we retrieve the page of the guest address, (NIB), from
   register REG2
- we the mediated device to use the VFIO pinning infratrsucture
   to pin the page of the guest address,
- we retrieve the pointer to KVM to register the guest ISC
   and retrieve the host ISC
- finaly we activate GISA

If we receive a demand to disable IRQs,
- we deactivate GISA
- unregister from the GIB
- unping the NIB

Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
[..]
+ */
+static void vfio_ap_free_irq(struct vfio_ap_queue *q)
+{
+	if (!q)
+		return;
+	if (q->g_pfn)
+		vfio_unpin_pages(mdev_dev(q->matrix_mdev->mdev), &q->g_pfn, 1);
+	if (q->isc)
+		kvm_s390_gisc_unregister(q->matrix_mdev->kvm, q->isc);

Ain't isc 0 a perfectly legit isc?

Exact, even GIB interface always gives 5 back I should initialize the ISC to a bad value like > 7
Will do, thanks.


+	q->nib = 0;
+	q->isc = 0;
+	q->g_pfn = 0;
+}
+
[..]
@@ -109,10 +131,16 @@ static int vfio_ap_mdev_create(struct kobject *kobj, struct mdev_device *mdev)
  static int vfio_ap_mdev_remove(struct mdev_device *mdev)
  {
  	struct ap_matrix_mdev *matrix_mdev = mdev_get_drvdata(mdev);
+	struct vfio_ap_queue *q, *qtmp;
if (matrix_mdev->kvm)
  		return -EBUSY;
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(q, qtmp, &matrix_mdev->qlist, list) {
+		q->matrix_mdev = NULL;
+		vfio_ap_mdev_reset_queue(q);
+		list_move(&q->list, &matrix_dev->free_list);

How about matrix_dev->lock? I guess you should protect free_list with
it. If not maybe a code comment would help not stumble over this.

Conny already commented that I forgot locks
I need a lock there and in the interception. May be more, I will check.


+	}
  	mutex_lock(&matrix_dev->lock);
  	list_del(&matrix_mdev->node);
  	mutex_unlock(&matrix_dev->lock);

[..]

+/**
+ * vfio_ap_setirq: Enable Interruption for a APQN
+ *
+ * @dev: the device associated with the ap_queue
+ * @q:   the vfio_ap_queue holding AQIC parameters
+ *
+ * Pin the NIB saved in *q
+ * Register the guest ISC to GIB interface and retrieve the
+ * host ISC to issue the host side PQAP/AQIC
+ *
+ * Response.status may be set to following Response Code in case of error:
+ * - AP_RESPONSE_INVALID_ADDRESS: vfio_pin_pages failed
+ * - AP_RESPONSE_OTHERWISE_CHANGED: Hypervizor GISA internal error
+ *
+ * Otherwise return the ap_queue_status returned by the ap_aqic()
+ */
+static struct ap_queue_status vfio_ap_setirq(struct vfio_ap_queue *q)
+{
+	struct ap_qirq_ctrl aqic_gisa = {};
+	struct ap_queue_status status = {};
+	struct kvm_s390_gisa *gisa;
+	struct kvm *kvm;
+	unsigned long g_pfn, h_nib, h_pfn;
+	int ret;
+
+	kvm = q->matrix_mdev->kvm;
+	gisa = kvm->arch.gisa_int.origin;
+
+	g_pfn = q->nib >> PAGE_SHIFT;
+	ret = vfio_pin_pages(mdev_dev(q->matrix_mdev->mdev), &g_pfn, 1,
+			     IOMMU_READ | IOMMU_WRITE, &h_pfn);
+	switch (ret) {
+	case 1:
+		break;
+	case -EINVAL:
+	case -E2BIG:
+		status.response_code = AP_RESPONSE_INVALID_ADDRESS;
+		/* Fallthrough */
+	default:
+		return status;
+	}
+
+	h_nib = (h_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT) | (q->nib & ~PAGE_MASK);
+	aqic_gisa.gisc = q->isc;
+	aqic_gisa.isc = kvm_s390_gisc_register(kvm, q->isc);
+	aqic_gisa.ir = 1;
+	aqic_gisa.gisa = gisa->next_alert >> 4;
+
+	status = ap_aqic(q->apqn, aqic_gisa, (void *)h_nib);
+	switch (status.response_code) {
+	case AP_RESPONSE_NORMAL:
+		if (q->g_pfn)
+			vfio_unpin_pages(mdev_dev(q->matrix_mdev->mdev),
+					 &q->g_pfn, 1);

Shouldn't you call kvm_s390_gisc_unregister() here.

I should.



+		q->g_pfn = g_pfn;
+		break;
+	case AP_RESPONSE_OTHERWISE_CHANGED:
+		vfio_unpin_pages(mdev_dev(q->matrix_mdev->mdev), &g_pfn, 1);

and here.

too


+		break;
+	case AP_RESPONSE_INVALID_GISA:
+		status.response_code = AP_RESPONSE_INVALID_ADDRESS;
+	default:	/* Fall Through */
+		pr_warn("%s: apqn %04x: response: %02x\n", __func__, q->apqn,
+			status.response_code);
+		vfio_ap_free_irq(q);

This guy won't unpin g_pfn but only q->g_pfn if not zero :/

OK, seems I have to rework this all.
Thanks.


+		break;
+	}
+
+	return status;
+}
+
+/**
+ * handle_pqap: PQAP instruction callback
+ *
+ * @vcpu: The vcpu on which we received the PQAP instruction
+ *
+ * Get the general register contents to initialize internal variables.
+ * REG[0]: APQN
+ * REG[1]: IR and ISC
+ * REG[2]: NIB
+ *
+ * Response.status may be set to following Response Code:
+ * - AP_RESPONSE_Q_NOT_AVAIL: if the queue is not available
+ * - AP_RESPONSE_DECONFIGURED: if the queue is not configured
+ * - AP_RESPONSE_NORMAL (0) : in case of successs
+ *   Check vfio_ap_setirq() and vfio_ap_clrirq() for other possible
RC.
+ *
+ * Return 0 if we could handle the request inside KVM.
+ * otherwise, returns -EOPNOTSUPP to let QEMU handle the fault.
+ */
+static int handle_pqap(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+	uint64_t status;
+	uint16_t apqn;
+	struct vfio_ap_queue *q;
+	struct ap_queue_status qstatus = {};
+	struct ap_matrix_mdev *matrix_mdev;
+
+	/* If we do not use the AIV facility just go to userland */
+	if (!(vcpu->arch.sie_block->eca & ECA_AIV))
+		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
+	apqn = vcpu->run->s.regs.gprs[0] & 0xffff;
+	matrix_mdev = vcpu->kvm->arch.crypto.vfio_private;
+	if (!matrix_mdev)
+		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+	q = vfio_ap_get_queue(apqn, &matrix_mdev->qlist);

This get is not a 'refcount affecting get' any more...

+	if (!q) {
+		qstatus.response_code = AP_RESPONSE_Q_NOT_AVAIL;
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	status = vcpu->run->s.regs.gprs[1];
+
+	/* If IR bit(16) is set we enable the interrupt */
+	if ((status >> (63 - 16)) & 0x01) {
+		q->isc = status & 0x07;
+		q->nib = vcpu->run->s.regs.gprs[2];

... and I don't see what should prevent a potential use after free here.

I think this will be corrected when I add the lock I forgot in handle_pqap.


Thanks for the comments,

Regards,
Pierre


--
Pierre Morel
Linux/KVM/QEMU in Böblingen - Germany




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux