On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 2:36 PM Heiko Carstens
<heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 02:15:18PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > I did not test the changes at runtime, but I looked at the
> > generated object code, which seems fine here and includes
> > the same conversions as before.
>
> All looks good and seems to work fine. This is a very nice
> simplification of our compat code, even if it adds some dead code to
> the kernel image.
>
> I did some tests and it all looks good. Also the generated code looks
> fine. So, if nothing breaks, this will go upstream with next merge
> window via the s390 tree.
>
> Thanks again for your work!
Awesome, thanks for testing it so quickly and agreeing to merge it!
There is a dependency that I now have for my y2038 syscall series
of course, so I'd need to have those patches on top of the s390 series.
I think we can either have a shared git branch that gets merged both
into your s390 tree and my y2038 tree, or we merge it only through
my tree, with your Ack.
Does that work for you?
Arnd
