On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 09:14:33AM -0700, Mathieu Poirier wrote: > On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 at 08:39, Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 04:07:37PM -0700, Mathieu Poirier wrote: > > > Add a "sinks" directory entry so that users can see all the sinks > > > available in the system in a single place. Individual sink are added > > > as they are registered with the coresight bus. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > .../hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm-perf.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++ > > > .../hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm-perf.h | 1 + > > > drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight.c | 17 ++++++++ > > > 3 files changed, 61 insertions(+) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm-perf.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm-perf.c > > > index f21eb28b6782..292bd409a68c 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm-perf.c > > > +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm-perf.c > > > @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ > > > #include <linux/perf_event.h> > > > #include <linux/percpu-defs.h> > > > #include <linux/slab.h> > > > +#include <linux/stringhash.h> > > > #include <linux/types.h> > > > #include <linux/workqueue.h> > > > > > > @@ -43,8 +44,18 @@ static const struct attribute_group etm_pmu_format_group = { > > > .attrs = etm_config_formats_attr, > > > }; > > > > > > +static struct attribute *etm_config_sinks_attr[] = { > > > + NULL, > > > +}; > > > + > > > +static const struct attribute_group etm_pmu_sinks_group = { > > > + .name = "sinks", > > > + .attrs = etm_config_sinks_attr, > > > +}; > > > + > > > static const struct attribute_group *etm_pmu_attr_groups[] = { > > > &etm_pmu_format_group, > > > + &etm_pmu_sinks_group, > > > NULL, > > > }; > > > > > > @@ -479,6 +490,38 @@ int etm_perf_symlink(struct coresight_device *csdev, bool link) > > > return 0; > > > } > > > > > > +static ssize_t etm_perf_sink_name_show(struct device *dev, > > > + struct device_attribute *dattr, > > > + char *buf) > > > +{ > > > + /* See function coresight_sink_by_id() to know where this is used */ > > > + u32 hash = hashlen_hash(hashlen_string(NULL, dattr->attr.name)); > > > + > > > + return scnprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "%x\n", hash); > > > +} > > > + > > > +int etm_perf_symlink_sink(struct coresight_device *csdev) > > > +{ > > > + struct device *pmu_dev = etm_pmu.dev; > > > + struct device *pdev = csdev->dev.parent; > > > + struct device_attribute *dev_attr; > > > + > > > + if (csdev->type != CORESIGHT_DEV_TYPE_SINK && > > > + csdev->type != CORESIGHT_DEV_TYPE_LINKSINK) > > > + return -EINVAL; > > > + > > > + if (!etm_perf_up) > > > + return -EPROBE_DEFER; > > > + > > > + dev_attr = kzalloc(sizeof(*dev_attr), GFP_KERNEL); > > > + dev_attr->attr.name = kstrdup(dev_name(pdev), GFP_KERNEL); > > > + dev_attr->attr.mode = 0444; > > > + dev_attr->show = etm_perf_sink_name_show; > > > + > > > + return sysfs_add_file_to_group(&pmu_dev->kobj, > > > + &dev_attr->attr, "sinks"); > > > > What is so odd about this call that you needed me to review this? > > As far as I can tell nobody is feeding a dynamic struct attribute to > the function and I wasn't sure if it was because they were told not to > or simply because it wasn't needed, hence asking for a second opinion. Ah. Well, again, this is a good question to answer: > > And what happens if this call fails, do you leak memory? And also, what happens when you unload the device, who frees the attribute's memory? thanks, greg k-h