On 05.12.18 13:56, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Wed 05-12-18 13:28:44, David Hildenbrand wrote: > [...] >> Most notably, for device memory we can hopefully soon stop setting >> it PG_reserved > > I am busy as hell so I am not likely to look at specific patche this > week. But could you be more specific why we need to get rid of other > PG_reserved users before we can do so for device memory? > No worries, this has time. For device memory, nothing should really be needed. I am only collecting and docuumenting users and this is one user soon to go (eventually) :) > I am all for removing relicts because they just confuse people but I > fail to see any relation here. > It's really only "why is this patch set not bigger", nothing related to device memory actually :) -- Thanks, David / dhildenb
