On 26.11.18 17:32, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Mon, 19 Nov 2018 18:25:27 +0100
Michael Mueller <mimu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The GIB (Guest Information Block) links the GISA of all guests
that have adapter interrupts pending. These interrupts cannot be
deliverd because no vcpu of these guests is currently running in
s/deliverd/delivered/
tx
SIE context. Instead, a GIB alert is issued on the host to schedule
these guests to run.
This mechanism allows to process adapter interrupts for currently
not running guests.
The GIB is created during host initialization and associated with
the Adapter Interruption Facility in case an Adapter Interruption
Virtualization Facility is available.
Signed-off-by: Michael Mueller <mimu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 10 ++++++++++
arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 1 +
arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h | 2 ++
4 files changed, 50 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index d5d24889c3bc..537e5e59f27e 100644
--- a/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -785,6 +785,15 @@ struct kvm_s390_gisa {
};
};
+struct kvm_s390_gib {
+ u32 alert_list_origin;
+ u32 reserved01;
+ u8:5;
+ u8 nisc:3;
+ u8 reserved03[3];
+ u32 reserved04[5];
+};
+
/*
* sie_page2 has to be allocated as DMA because fac_list, crycb and
* gisa need 31bit addresses in the sie control block.
@@ -838,6 +847,7 @@ struct kvm_arch{
/* subset of available cpu features enabled by user space */
DECLARE_BITMAP(cpu_feat, KVM_S390_VM_CPU_FEAT_NR_BITS);
struct kvm_s390_gisa *gisa;
+ int gib_in_use;
};
#define KVM_HVA_ERR_BAD (-1UL)
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c b/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
index 1f4c0c7286f7..2149059e9e17 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
@@ -31,6 +31,8 @@
#define PFAULT_DONE 0x0680
#define VIRTIO_PARAM 0x0d00
+static struct kvm_s390_gib *gib;
+
/* handle external calls via sigp interpretation facility */
static int sca_ext_call_pending(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int *src_id)
{
@@ -2895,6 +2897,7 @@ void kvm_s390_gisa_init(struct kvm *kvm)
kvm->arch.gisa = &kvm->arch.sie_page2->gisa;
VM_EVENT(kvm, 3, "gisa 0x%pK initialized", kvm->arch.gisa);
kvm_s390_gisa_clear(kvm);
+ kvm->arch.gib_in_use = !!gib;
So, that's basically gib && aiv?
}
}
@@ -2904,3 +2907,37 @@ void kvm_s390_gisa_destroy(struct kvm *kvm)
return;
kvm->arch.gisa = NULL;
}
+
+void kvm_s390_gib_destroy(void)
+{
+ if (!gib)
+ return;
+ chsc_sgib(0);
+ free_page((unsigned long)gib);
+ gib = NULL;
+}
+
+int kvm_s390_gib_init(u8 nisc)
+{
+ if (!css_general_characteristics.aiv) {
+ KVM_EVENT(3, "%s", "gib not initialized, no AIV facility");
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ gib = (struct kvm_s390_gib *)get_zeroed_page(GFP_KERNEL | GFP_DMA);
+ if (!gib) {
+ KVM_EVENT(3, "gib 0x%pK memory allocation failed", gib);
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ }
+
+ gib->nisc = nisc;
+ if (chsc_sgib((u32)(u64)gib)) {
+ KVM_EVENT(3, "gib 0x%pK AIV association failed", gib);
+ free_page((unsigned long)gib);
+ gib = NULL;
+ return -EIO;
+ }
+
+ KVM_EVENT(3, "gib 0x%pK (nisc=%d) initialized", gib, gib->nisc);
+ return 0;
+}
And given that you now fail initializing the vm if aiv is present but
you could not setup the gib (which makes sense), isn't it enough to
either check for aiv or gib, instead of adding gib_in_use? (There's
always a pointer to a valid gisa if aiv.) What am I missing?
In addition there is the vSIE case where I have no AIV and thus no GISA.
