Re: [PATCH v1 6/7] vfio: ap: register guest ISC with GISA and GIB

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/31/18 2:12 PM, Pierre Morel wrote:
Register to the GIB Alert list and retrieve the GAL_ISC
to pass to the GISA registration.

Unregister on error and when clearing the interrupt.

Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Michael Mueller <mimu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c | 16 +++++++++++++---
  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
index f68102163bf4..232168797fb8 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
@@ -903,16 +903,20 @@ static int ap_ioctl_setirq(struct ap_matrix_mdev *matrix_mdev,
  	struct ap_status ap_status = reg2status(0);
  	unsigned long p;
  	int ret = -1;
-	int apqn;
+	int apqn, gal_isc;
  	uint32_t gd;
+ gal_isc = kvm_s390_gisc_register(matrix_mdev->kvm, matrix_mdev->gisc);
+	if (gal_isc < 0)
+		return -EIO;
+
  	apqn = (int)(parm->cmd & 0xffff);
gd = matrix_mdev->kvm->vcpus[0]->arch.sie_block->gd;
  	if (gd & 0x01)
  		aqic_gisa.f = 1;
  	aqic_gisa.gisc = matrix_mdev->gisc;
-	aqic_gisa.isc = GAL_ISC;
+	aqic_gisa.isc = gal_isc;
  	aqic_gisa.ir = 1;
  	aqic_gisa.gisao = gisa->next_alert >> 4;
@@ -923,7 +927,11 @@ static int ap_ioctl_setirq(struct ap_matrix_mdev *matrix_mdev,
  	parm->status = ret;
ap_status = reg2status(ret);
-	return (ap_status.rc) ? -EIO : 0;
+	if (ap_status.rc) {
+		kvm_s390_gisc_unregister(matrix_mdev->kvm, matrix_mdev->gisc);
+		return -EIO;
+	}
+	return 0;
  }
static int ap_ioctl_clrirq(struct ap_matrix_mdev *matrix_mdev,
@@ -946,6 +954,8 @@ static int ap_ioctl_clrirq(struct ap_matrix_mdev *matrix_mdev,
  	parm->status = retval;
ap_status = reg2status(retval);
+	/* unregister the IAM from the GIB anyway! */
+	kvm_s390_gisc_unregister(matrix_mdev->kvm, matrix_mdev->gisc);

The case statement in patch 4 does not set mdev->gisc, so the
presumption here is that VFIO_AP_SET_IRQ has been previously called and
has set the value for matrix_mdev->gisc. Is it possible for
VFIO_AP_CLEAR_IRQ to get invoked without a prior call to
VFIO_AP_SET_IRQ? In any case, shouldn't the GISC value be taken from
bits 61-63 of 'parm'?

  	return (ap_status.rc) ? -EIO : 0;
  }




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux