On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 02:29:28PM +0800, Pingfan Liu wrote:
> > I think it is caused by the uinon page->lru and page->next. It can be fixed by:
> > diff --git a/include/linux/slub_def.h b/include/linux/slub_def.h
> > index 3a1a1db..4aa0fb5 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/slub_def.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/slub_def.h
> > @@ -56,6 +56,7 @@ struct kmem_cache_cpu {
> > #define slub_set_percpu_partial(c, p) \
> > ({ \
> > slub_percpu_partial(c) = (p)->next; \
> > + p->next = NULL; \
> > })
> >
> > I will do some test and post the fix.
> >
> Please ignore the above comment. And after re-check the code, I am
> sure that all callers of deactivate_slab(), pass c->page, which means
> that page should not be on any list. But your test result "list_add
> double add: new=000003d1029ecc08,
> prev=000000008ff846d0,next=000003d1029ecc08" indicates that
> page(new) is already on a list. I think that maybe something else is
> wrong which is covered.
> I can not reproduce this bug on x86. Could you share your config and
> cmdline? Any do you turn on any debug option of slub?
You can re-create the config with "make ARCH=s390 debug_defconfig".
Not sure which machine I used to reproduce this but most likely it was
a machine with these command line options:
dasd=e12d root=/dev/dasda1 userprocess_debug numa_debug sched_debug
ignore_loglevel sclp_con_drop=1 sclp_con_pages=32 audit=0
crashkernel=128M ignore_rlimit_data
You can ignore the dasd and sclp* command line options. These are
s390 specific. The rest should be available on any architecture.
