On 10/02/2018 03:02 AM, Eric Farman wrote: > We have two nested loops to check the entries within the pfn_array_table > arrays. But we mistakenly use the outer array as an index in our check, > and completely ignore the indexing performed by the inner loop. > > Signed-off-by: Eric Farman <farman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> I think this qualifies for stable. > --- > drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.c b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.c > index dbe7c7ac9ac8..fd77e46eb3b2 100644 > --- a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.c > +++ b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.c > @@ -163,7 +163,7 @@ static bool pfn_array_table_iova_pinned(struct pfn_array_table *pat, > > for (i = 0; i < pat->pat_nr; i++, pa++) > for (j = 0; j < pa->pa_nr; j++) > - if (pa->pa_iova_pfn[i] == iova_pfn) > + if (pa->pa_iova_pfn[j] == iova_pfn) > return true; > > return false; >
