Re: [PATCH v10 00/26] guest dedicated crypto adapters

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 09/24/2018 07:49 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Wed, 12 Sep 2018 15:42:50 -0400
Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Abstract:
========

On s390, we have cryptographic coprocessor cards, which are modeled on
Linux as devices on the AP bus. Each card can be partitioned into domains
which can be thought of as a set of hardware registers for processing
crypto commands. Crypto commands are sent to a specific domain within a
card is via a queue which is identified as a (card,domain) tuple. We model
this something like the following (assuming we have access to cards 3 and
4 and domains 1 and 2):

AP -> card3 -> queue (3,1)
             -> queue (3,2)
    -> card4 -> queue (4,1)
             -> queue (4,2)

If we want to virtualize this, we can use a feature provided by the
hardware. We basically attach a satellite control block to our main
hardware virtualization control block and the hardware takes care of
most of the rest.

For this control block, we don't specify explicit tuples, but a list of
cards and a list of domains. The guest will get access to the cross
product.

Because of this, we need to take care that the lists provided to
different guests don't overlap; i.e., we need to enforce sane
configurations. Otherwise, one guest may get access to things like
secret keys for another guest.

The idea of this patch set is to introduce a new device, the matrix
device. This matrix device hangs off a different root and acts as the
parent node for mdev devices.

If you now want to give the tuples (4,1) and (4,2), you need to do the
following:

- Make sure the queues (4,1) and (4,2) belong to vfio_ap (see patches
   #5 and #6)
- Create the mediated device.
- Assign card 4 and domains 1 and 2 to the mediated device
- Optionally activate the mediated device.

QEMU will now simply consume the mediated device and things should work.

For a complete description of the architecture and concepts underlying
the design, see the Documentation/s390/vfio-ap.txt file included with this
patch set.

I did not spot anything major, and if v11 addresses the issues raised
by various reviewers I don't see why it should not be merged (interface
looks sane). I skipped looking at the vsie stuff, though ;)

I think David has that covered.






[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux