On Sep 17 2018, YueHaibing <yuehaibing@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 2018/9/15 19:35, Andreas Schwab wrote: >> On Sep 15 2018, YueHaibing <yuehaibing@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> Comparing an int to a size, which is unsigned, causes the int to become >>> unsigned, giving the wrong result. kernel_sendmsg can return a negative >>> error code. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >>> net/smc/smc_clc.c | 2 +- >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/net/smc/smc_clc.c b/net/smc/smc_clc.c >>> index 83aba9a..fd0f5ce 100644 >>> --- a/net/smc/smc_clc.c >>> +++ b/net/smc/smc_clc.c >>> @@ -446,7 +446,7 @@ int smc_clc_send_proposal(struct smc_sock *smc, int smc_type, >>> vec[i++].iov_len = sizeof(trl); >>> /* due to the few bytes needed for clc-handshake this cannot block */ >>> len = kernel_sendmsg(smc->clcsock, &msg, vec, i, plen); >>> - if (len < sizeof(pclc)) { >>> + if (len < (int)sizeof(pclc)) { >>> if (len >= 0) { >>> reason_code = -ENETUNREACH; >>> smc->sk.sk_err = -reason_code; >> >> It would perhaps be better to handle len < 0 first. > > That need refactor the err hangding, is worth doing it? Just a few lines moving around, IFAICS. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510 2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1 "And now for something completely different."