On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 5:36 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Sep 9, 2018 at 6:38 AM Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Sep 08, 2018 at 04:28:17PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > MTIOCPOS and MTIOCGET are incompatible between 32-bit and 64-bit user
> > > space, and traditionally have been translated in fs/compat_ioctl.c.
> > >
> > > To get rid of that translation handler, move a corresponding
> > > implementation into each of the four drivers implementing those commands.
> > >
> > > The interesting part of that is now in a new linux/mtio.h header that
> > > wraps the existing uapi/linux/mtio.h header and provides an abstraction
> > > to let drivers handle both cases easily.
> >
> > Ugh... Frankly, this bool compat passed all way down looks wrong.
> > I can live with that; the question is whether block folks will be
> > OK with that thing...
>
> I have tried to come up with an alternative, but couldn't really find anything
> that is less ugly. Since nobody else complained, I'll resend this version
> along with the other patches.
Actually, there was one idea that Deepa mentioned for another subsystem
with a similar issue: instead of passing down the fact that we come from
a compat syscall through multiple function calls, the lowest ones
(put_user_mtpos, put_user_mtget) could call in_compat_syscall().
Would you prefer that?
Arnd
