Re: [PATCH 1/2] s390: vmlogrdr: Use ARRAY_SIZE instead of reimplementing its function

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 8 Sep 2018 18:26:27 +0800, zhong jiang wrote:
> ARRAY_SIZE has implemented its function. we prefer to use the function
> rather than the open code.
> 
> Signed-off-by: zhong jiang <zhongjiang@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/s390/char/vmlogrdr.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/s390/char/vmlogrdr.c b/drivers/s390/char/vmlogrdr.c
> index 069b9ef..58333cb 100644
> --- a/drivers/s390/char/vmlogrdr.c
> +++ b/drivers/s390/char/vmlogrdr.c
> @@ -153,7 +153,7 @@ static void vmlogrdr_iucv_message_pending(struct iucv_path *,
>  	}
>  };
>  
> -#define MAXMINOR  (sizeof(sys_ser)/sizeof(struct vmlogrdr_priv_t))
> +#define MAXMINOR  ARRAY_SIZE(sys_ser)
>  
>  static char FENCE[] = {"EOR"};
>  static int vmlogrdr_major = 0;

Reviewed-by: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@xxxxxxx>

-- 
Jean Delvare
SUSE L3 Support



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux