Re: [PATCH 2/3] s390/kvm: handle diagnose 318 instruction call

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2018-08-31 18:51, Collin Walling wrote:
> The diagnose 318 instruction is a privileged instruction that must be
> interpreted by SIE and handled via KVM.
> 
> The control program name and version codes (CPNC and CPVC) set by this
> instruction are saved to the kvm->arch struct. The CPNC is also set in
> the SIE control block of all VCPUs. The new kvm_s390_set_misc interface
> is introduced for migration.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Collin Walling <walling@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h       |  6 ++-
>  arch/s390/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h       |  5 ++
>  arch/s390/kvm/diag.c                   | 16 ++++++
>  arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c               | 90 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h               |  1 +
>  tools/arch/s390/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h |  1 +
>  6 files changed, 118 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index 29c940b..fabeb32 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -227,7 +227,8 @@ struct kvm_s390_sie_block {
>  	__u32	scaol;			/* 0x0064 */
>  	__u8	reserved68;		/* 0x0068 */
>  	__u8    epdx;			/* 0x0069 */
> -	__u8    reserved6a[2];		/* 0x006a */
> +	__u8    cpnc;			/* 0x006a */
> +	__u8	reserved6b;		/* 0x006b */
>  	__u32	todpr;			/* 0x006c */
>  #define GISA_FORMAT1 0x00000001
>  	__u32	gd;			/* 0x0070 */
> @@ -383,6 +384,7 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_stat {
>  	u64 diagnose_9c;
>  	u64 diagnose_258;
>  	u64 diagnose_308;
> +	u64 diagnose_318;
>  	u64 diagnose_500;
>  	u64 diagnose_other;
>  };
> @@ -829,6 +831,8 @@ struct kvm_arch{
>  	/* subset of available cpu features enabled by user space */
>  	DECLARE_BITMAP(cpu_feat, KVM_S390_VM_CPU_FEAT_NR_BITS);
>  	struct kvm_s390_gisa *gisa;
> +	u8 cpnc;
> +	u64 cpvc;
>  };

<bikeshedding>
Note sure if it's worth the effort, but maybe merge the two struct
members into one 64 bit value?

 struct {
   u64 cpnc:8;
   u64 cpvc:56;
 }

?

Or maybe move the new lonely u8 field next to the other lonely u8 field
in that struct?
</bikeshedding>

The other parts of the patch look fine to me.

 Thomas



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux