On 07.08.2018 14:51, David Hildenbrand wrote: > VCPU requests and VCPU blocking right now don't take care of the vSIE > (as it was not necessary until now). But we want to have VCPU requests > that will also be handled before running the vSIE again. > > So let's simulate a SIE entry when entering the vSIE loop and check > for PROG_ flags. The existing infrastructure (e.g. exit_sie()) will then > detect that the SIE (in form of the vSIE execution loop) is running and > properly kick the vSIE CPU, resulting in it leaving the vSIE loop and > therefore the vSIE interception handler, allowing it to handle VCPU > requests. > > E.g. if we want to modify the crycb of the VCPU and make sure that any > masks also get applied to the VSIE crycb shadow (which uses masks from the > VCPU crycb), we will need a way to hinder the vSIE from running and make > sure to process the updated crycb before reentering the vSIE again. > > Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx> Finally found some time: Reviewed-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> As the first user will be AP, I guess the patches will be queued with them. Thanks for helping out :)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
