Re: [PATCH v12 04/11] kvm/x86: remove kvm memblock dependency

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 6 Jul 2018, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 06/07/2018 11:45, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> >> One possibility is to introduce another layer of indirection: in
> >> addition to the percpu pvclock data, add a percpu pointer to the pvclock
> >> data and initialize it to point to a page-aligned variable in BSS.  CPU0
> >> (used by vDSO) doesn't touch the pointer and keeps using the BSS
> >> variable, APs instead redirect the pointer to the percpu data.
> > Yeah, thought about that, but the extra indirection is ugly. Instead of
> > using per cpu data, I just can allocate the memory _after_ the allocators
> > are up and running and use a single page sized static __initdata for the
> > early boot.
> 
> Either works for me.  Assembly-wise, the indirection should be more or
> less the same as what we have now; even more efficient because it
> accesses a percpu pointer instead of computing it based on
> smp_processor_id().

Good point. Let me try that.

Thanks,

	tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-s390" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux