Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Assigning NULL to gfn of dax_direct_access if useless

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 






 ---- On Thu, 05 Jul 2018 00:48:40 +0800 Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx> wrote ---- 
 > On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 9:38 AM, Huaisheng Ye <yehs2007@xxxxxxxx> wrote: 
 > > From: Huaisheng Ye <yehs1@xxxxxxxxxx> 
 > > 
 > > Changes since v1 [1]: 
 > > * Collect Jan's reviewed-by. 
 > > * According to Dan's suggestion, update the unit test infrastructure 
 > >   tools/testing/nvdimm/pmem-dax.c for checking the validity of gfn. 
 > > 
 > > [1]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/7/4/81 
 > > 
 > > --- 
 > > 
 > > Some functions within fs/dax don't need to get gfn from direct_access. 
 >  
 > Any reason you are calling it 'gfn'? I'm assuming that is a typo and 
 > it should be 'pfn'. 

Oh, sorry.
I made a mistake, it is a typo. I will correct it right now.

---
Cheers,
Huaisheng Ye

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-s390" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux