Re: [PATCH v12 01/11] x86: text_poke() may access uninitialized struct pages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 25 Jun 2018, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 10:39:24AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Mon, 25 Jun 2018, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > I'm not entirely sure this is right.. Because not only do we need the
> > > whole fixmap stuff working, we also need #DB and the IPI handlers set-up
> > > and working.
> > 
> > IPI? That's early UP boot why would you need an IPI?
> 
> Because the way this is called is from __jump_label_transform() ->
> text_poke_bp() -> text_poke() -> text_poke_early().
> 
> And if you look at text_poke_bp(), you'll note it relies on #DB and
> on_each_cpu() IPIs.

on_each_cpu() resolves to a direct call on the current CPU and as there is
no other CPU it does not matter. #DB might be a different story, haven't
looked yet.

> Which is of course exactly the reason I avoided text_poke_bp() entirely
> in the first place.

Fair enough.

Thanks,

	tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-s390" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux