On Thu, 21 Jun 2018, Pavel Tatashin wrote:
> read_boot_clock64() is deleted, and replaced with
> read_persistent_wall_and_boot_offset().
>
> The default implementation of read_persistent_wall_and_boot_offset()
> provides a better fallback than the current stubs for read_boot_clock64()
> that arm has, so remove the old code.
You forgot to say, that this function has no users, so the removal is not
changing anything,
>
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/arm/kernel/time.c | 12 +-----------
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/time.c b/arch/arm/kernel/time.c
> index cf2701cb0de8..0a6a457b13c7 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/time.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/time.c
> @@ -83,29 +83,19 @@ static void dummy_clock_access(struct timespec64 *ts)
> }
>
> static clock_access_fn __read_persistent_clock = dummy_clock_access;
> -static clock_access_fn __read_boot_clock = dummy_clock_access;
>
> void read_persistent_clock64(struct timespec64 *ts)
> {
> __read_persistent_clock(ts);
> }
>
> -void read_boot_clock64(struct timespec64 *ts)
> -{
> - __read_boot_clock(ts);
> -}
> -
> int __init register_persistent_clock(clock_access_fn read_boot,
> clock_access_fn read_persistent)
> {
> /* Only allow the clockaccess functions to be registered once */
> - if (__read_persistent_clock == dummy_clock_access &&
> - __read_boot_clock == dummy_clock_access) {
> - if (read_boot)
> - __read_boot_clock = read_boot;
That leaves the fn_read_boot argument unused. So this wants to be cleaned
up as well.
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-s390" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
