On Mon, 7 May 2018 11:11:44 -0400
Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Registers the matrix device created by the VFIO AP device
> driver with the VFIO mediated device framework.
> Registering the matrix device will create the sysfs
> structures needed to create mediated matrix devices
> each of which will be used to configure the AP matrix
> for a guest and connect it to the VFIO AP device driver.
>
> Registering the matrix device with the VFIO mediated device
> framework will create the following sysfs structures:
>
> /sys/devices/vfio_ap
> ... [matrix]
> ...... [mdev_supported_types]
> ......... [vfio_ap-passthrough]
> ............ create
>
> To create a mediated device for the AP matrix device, write a UUID
> to the create file:
>
> uuidgen > create
>
> A symbolic link to the mediated device's directory will be created in the
> devices subdirectory named after the generated $uuid:
>
> /sys/devices/vfio_ap
> ... [matrix]
> ...... [mdev_supported_types]
> ......... [vfio_ap-passthrough]
> ............ [devices]
> ............... [$uuid]
>
> Signed-off-by: Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> MAINTAINERS | 1 +
> drivers/s390/crypto/Makefile | 2 +-
> drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_drv.c | 9 +++
> drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c | 106 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_private.h | 17 +++++
> 5 files changed, 134 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
> diff --git a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..d7d36fb
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,106 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
> +/*
> + * Adjunct processor matrix VFIO device driver callbacks.
> + *
> + * Copyright IBM Corp. 2017
Should be '2018' (also in some other files in this series; please
double check.)
> + * Author(s): Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> + *
> + */
> +#include <linux/string.h>
> +#include <linux/vfio.h>
> +#include <linux/device.h>
> +#include <linux/list.h>
> +#include <linux/ctype.h>
> +
> +#include "vfio_ap_private.h"
> +
> +#define VFOP_AP_MDEV_TYPE_HWVIRT "passthrough"
> +#define VFIO_AP_MDEV_NAME_HWVIRT "VFIO AP Passthrough Device"
> +
> +static int vfio_ap_mdev_create(struct kobject *kobj, struct mdev_device *mdev)
> +{
> + struct ap_matrix *ap_matrix = to_ap_matrix(mdev_parent_dev(mdev));
> +
> + ap_matrix->available_instances--;
Shouldn't the code check whether available_instances is actually > 0?
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int vfio_ap_mdev_remove(struct mdev_device *mdev)
> +{
> + struct ap_matrix *ap_matrix = to_ap_matrix(mdev_parent_dev(mdev));
> +
> + ap_matrix->available_instances++;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static ssize_t name_show(struct kobject *kobj, struct device *dev, char *buf)
> +{
> + return sprintf(buf, "%s\n", VFIO_AP_MDEV_NAME_HWVIRT);
> +}
> +
> +MDEV_TYPE_ATTR_RO(name);
> +
> +static ssize_t available_instances_show(struct kobject *kobj,
> + struct device *dev, char *buf)
> +{
> + struct ap_matrix *ap_matrix;
> +
> + ap_matrix = to_ap_matrix(dev);
Move this with the declaration?
> +
> + return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", ap_matrix->available_instances);
> +}
> +
> +MDEV_TYPE_ATTR_RO(available_instances);
> +
> +static ssize_t device_api_show(struct kobject *kobj, struct device *dev,
> + char *buf)
> +{
> + return sprintf(buf, "%s\n", VFIO_DEVICE_API_AP_STRING);
> +}
> +
> +MDEV_TYPE_ATTR_RO(device_api);
> +
> +static struct attribute *vfio_ap_mdev_type_attrs[] = {
> + &mdev_type_attr_name.attr,
> + &mdev_type_attr_device_api.attr,
> + &mdev_type_attr_available_instances.attr,
> + NULL,
> +};
> +
> +static struct attribute_group vfio_ap_mdev_hwvirt_type_group = {
> + .name = VFOP_AP_MDEV_TYPE_HWVIRT,
> + .attrs = vfio_ap_mdev_type_attrs,
> +};
> +
> +static struct attribute_group *vfio_ap_mdev_type_groups[] = {
> + &vfio_ap_mdev_hwvirt_type_group,
> + NULL,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct mdev_parent_ops vfio_ap_matrix_ops = {
> + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> + .supported_type_groups = vfio_ap_mdev_type_groups,
> + .create = vfio_ap_mdev_create,
> + .remove = vfio_ap_mdev_remove,
> +};
> +
> +int vfio_ap_mdev_register(struct ap_matrix *ap_matrix)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = mdev_register_device(&ap_matrix->device, &vfio_ap_matrix_ops);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + ap_matrix->available_instances = AP_MATRIX_MAX_AVAILABLE_INSTANCES;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +void vfio_ap_mdev_unregister(struct ap_matrix *ap_matrix)
> +{
> + ap_matrix->available_instances--;
> + mdev_unregister_device(&ap_matrix->device);
> +}
> diff --git a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_private.h b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_private.h
> index cf23675..afd8dbc 100644
> --- a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_private.h
> +++ b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_private.h
> @@ -10,14 +10,31 @@
> #define _VFIO_AP_PRIVATE_H_
>
> #include <linux/types.h>
> +#include <linux/device.h>
> +#include <linux/mdev.h>
>
> #include "ap_bus.h"
>
> #define VFIO_AP_MODULE_NAME "vfio_ap"
> #define VFIO_AP_DRV_NAME "vfio_ap"
> +/**
> + * There must be one mediated matrix device per guest. If every APQN is assigned
One, or at most one? Or one for every guest using ap devices?
> + * to a guest, then the maximum number of guests with a unique APQN assigned
> + * would be 255 adapters x 255 domains = 72351 guests.
> + */
> +#define AP_MATRIX_MAX_AVAILABLE_INSTANCES 72351
>
> struct ap_matrix {
> struct device device;
> + int available_instances;
> };
>
> +static inline struct ap_matrix *to_ap_matrix(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + return container_of(dev, struct ap_matrix, device);
> +}
> +
> +extern int vfio_ap_mdev_register(struct ap_matrix *ap_matrix);
> +extern void vfio_ap_mdev_unregister(struct ap_matrix *ap_matrix);
> +
> #endif /* _VFIO_AP_PRIVATE_H_ */
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-s390" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
