[PATCH v2 1/2] KVM: s390: vsie: fix < 8k check for the itdba

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



By missing an "L", we might detect some addresses to be <8k,
although they are not.

e.g. for itdba = 100001fff
!(gpa & ~0x1fffU) -> 1
!(gpa & ~0x1fffUL) -> 0

So we would report a SIE validity intercept although everything is fine.

Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c b/arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c
index 8961e3970901..969882b54266 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c
@@ -578,7 +578,7 @@ static int pin_blocks(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vsie_page *vsie_page)
 
 	gpa = READ_ONCE(scb_o->itdba) & ~0xffUL;
 	if (gpa && (scb_s->ecb & ECB_TE)) {
-		if (!(gpa & ~0x1fffU)) {
+		if (!(gpa & ~0x1fffUL)) {
 			rc = set_validity_icpt(scb_s, 0x0080U);
 			goto unpin;
 		}
-- 
2.14.3

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-s390" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux