On Wed, 25 Apr 2018 15:55:51 +0200 Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 25/04/2018 10:44, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > On Thu, 19 Apr 2018 16:48:12 +0200 > > Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> VFIO_CCW_STATE_BOXED and VFIO_CCW_STATE_BUSY are the same > >> states. > >> Let's only keep one: VFIO_CCW_STATE_BUSY > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> --- > >> drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_fsm.c | 9 --------- > >> drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_private.h | 1 - > >> 2 files changed, 10 deletions(-) > > I think they were initially supposed to cover two different things: > > - BUSY: we're currently dealing with an I/O request > > - BOXED: the device currently won't talk to us or we won't talk to it > > > > It seems we never really did anything useful with BOXED; but should we? > > > I do not know what. The BUSY state is something we know that we'll get out of soon-ish (when the I/O request has finished). We could conceivably use a timeout and drop to the BOXED state if we don't get an answer. I think this plays also into the reserve/release and path handling questions. One of the more common reasons for devices to become boxed I've seen is another system doing a reserve on a dasd. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-s390" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
