On Tue, 24 Apr 2018 10:22:15 +0200 Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 24/04/2018 09:25, Dong Jia Shi wrote: > > * Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [2018-04-19 16:48:05 +0200]: > > > >> We change the FSM functions to return the next state, > >> and adapt the fsm_func_t function type. > > I think I'd need to read the rest patches to understand why we need this > > one, but no hurt to write some ideas that I noticed at my first glance. > > See below please. > > > >> Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> --- > >> drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_fsm.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++-------- > >> drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_private.h | 5 +++-- > >> 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > >> diff --git a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_private.h b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_private.h > >> index 78a66d9..f526b18 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_private.h > >> +++ b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_private.h > >> @@ -83,13 +83,14 @@ enum vfio_ccw_event { > >> /* > >> * Action called through jumptable. > >> */ > >> -typedef void (fsm_func_t)(struct vfio_ccw_private *, enum vfio_ccw_event); > >> +typedef int (fsm_func_t)(struct vfio_ccw_private *, enum vfio_ccw_event); > >> extern fsm_func_t *vfio_ccw_jumptable[NR_VFIO_CCW_STATES][NR_VFIO_CCW_EVENTS]; > >> > >> static inline void vfio_ccw_fsm_event(struct vfio_ccw_private *private, > >> int event) > >> { > >> - vfio_ccw_jumptable[private->state][event](private, event); > >> + private->state = vfio_ccw_jumptable[private->state][event](private, > >> + event); > > Since here it assigns new value to private->state, there is no need to > > do that inside each fsm_func? > Absolutely. > I just kept the previous code, just adding the return private->state in > the functions > in this patch. > merging the state and the return value is done in a later patch. > If you prefer I can do it in this patch. I think we should revisit this later. It's hard to judge this patch on its own. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-s390" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html