On 04/25/2018 08:57 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
AFAIU this will be the problem of the person implementing the clear
and the halt for vfio-ccw. I.e. it's a non-problem right now.
Well, that person is me:) I will post some RFC Real Soon Now if I stop
getting sidetracked...
Makes sense. It should be fine either way AFAIU.
CSCH, more precisely the clear function is supposed to clear the
interruption request(s) too. But I guess there is no way of the CP to
identify an I/O interrupt that should have been cleared -- that is catch
us disrespecting the architecture. I can't think of a way to establish
must happen before relationship...
But discarding the first interrupt and delivering just one for the CSCH
is fine too for the same reason.
Regards,
Halil
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-s390" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
