On Wed, 14 Mar 2018 14:25:47 -0400
Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Provides interfaces to assign AP adapters, usage domains
> and control domains to a KVM guest.
>
> A KVM guest is started by executing the Start Interpretive Execution (SIE)
> instruction. The SIE state description is a control block that contains the
> state information for a KVM guest and is supplied as input to the SIE
> instruction. The SIE state description has a satellite structure called the
> Crypto Control Block (CRYCB). The CRYCB contains three bitmask fields
> identifying the adapters, queues (domains) and control domains assigned to
> the KVM guest:
>
> * The AP Adapter Mask (APM) field identifies the AP adapters assigned to
> the KVM guest
>
> * The AP Queue Mask (AQM) field identifies the AP queues assigned to
> the KVM guest. Each AP queue is connected to a usage domain within
> an AP adapter.
>
> * The AP Domain Mask (ADM) field identifies the control domains
> assigned to the KVM guest.
>
> Each adapter, queue (usage domain) and control domain are identified by
> a number from 0 to 255. The bits in each mask, from most significant to
> least significant bit, correspond to the numbers 0-255. When a bit is
> set, the corresponding adapter, queue (usage domain) or control domain
> is assigned to the KVM guest.
>
> This patch will set the bits in the APM, AQM and ADM fields of the
> CRYCB referenced by the KVM guest's SIE state description. The process
> used is:
>
> 1. Verify that the bits to be set do not exceed the maximum bit
> number for the given mask.
>
> 2. Verify that the APQNs that can be derived from the intersection
> of the bits set in the APM and AQM fields of the KVM guest's CRYCB
> are not assigned to any other KVM guest running on the same linux
> host.
>
> 3. Set the APM, AQM and ADM in the CRYCB according to the matrix
> configured for the mediated matrix device via its sysfs
> adapter, domain and control domain attribute files respectively.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/s390/include/asm/kvm-ap.h | 36 +++++
> arch/s390/kvm/kvm-ap.c | 268 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c | 19 +++
> drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_private.h | 4 +
> 4 files changed, 327 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-ap.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-ap.c
> index a2c6ad2..eb365e2 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-ap.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-ap.c
> @@ -8,9 +8,129 @@
>
> #include <asm/kvm-ap.h>
> #include <asm/ap.h>
> +#include <linux/bitops.h>
>
> #include "kvm-s390.h"
>
> +static inline void kvm_ap_clear_crycb_masks(struct kvm *kvm)
> +{
> + int crycb_fmt = kvm->arch.crypto.crycbd & CRYCB_FORMAT_MASK;
> +
> + if (crycb_fmt == CRYCB_FORMAT2)
> + memset(&kvm->arch.crypto.crycb->apcb1, 0,
> + sizeof(kvm->arch.crypto.crycb->apcb1));
> + else
> + memset(&kvm->arch.crypto.crycb->apcb0, 0,
> + sizeof(kvm->arch.crypto.crycb->apcb0));
> +}
Should that rather be a switch/case? If there's a CRYCB_FORMAT3 in the
future, I'd think that it's more likely that it uses apcb1 and not
apcb0. Can't comment further without the architecture, obviously.
(...)
> +static void kvm_ap_set_crycb_masks(struct kvm *kvm,
> + struct kvm_ap_matrix *matrix)
> +{
> + unsigned long *apm = kvm_ap_get_crycb_apm(kvm);
> + unsigned long *aqm = kvm_ap_get_crycb_aqm(kvm);
> + unsigned long *adm = kvm_ap_get_crycb_adm(kvm);
> +
> + kvm_ap_clear_crycb_masks(kvm);
> + memcpy(apm, matrix->apm, KVM_AP_MASK_BYTES(matrix->apm_max));
> + memcpy(aqm, matrix->aqm, KVM_AP_MASK_BYTES(matrix->aqm_max));
> +
> + /*
> + * Merge the AQM and ADM since the ADM is a superset of the
> + * AQM by architectural convention.
Is this 'architectural convention' in the sense of 'there's a statement
in the architecture that it always is like that', or in the sense of
'all real-life systems are like that'?
[From my sketchy memory, this convention makes sense but is not
enshrined; but I might misremember.]
> + */
> + bitmap_or(adm, adm, aqm, matrix->adm_max);
> +}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-s390" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
