Re: [RFC PATCH 4/6] mm: provide generic compat_sys_readahead() implementation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 11:23:42PM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> static inline long C_S_moron(int, loff_t, size_t);
> long compat_SyS_moron(long a0, long a1, long a2, long a3, long a4, long a5, long a6)
> {
> 	return C_S_moron((__force int)a0,
> 		  (__force loff_t)(((u64)a2 << 32)|a1),
> 		  (__force size_t)a3);
> }
> static inline long C_S_moron(int fd, loff_t offset, size_t count)
> {
> 	whatever body you had for it
> }
> 
> That - from
> COMPAT_SYSCALL_DEFINE3(moron, int, fd, loff_t, offset, size_t, count)
> {
> 	whatever body you had for it
> }
> 
> We can use similar machinery for SYSCALL_DEFINE itself, so that
> SyS_moron() would be defined with (long, long, long, long, long, long)
> as arguments and not (long, long long, long) as we have now.

That would be great, as it would allow to use a struct pt_regs * based
syscall calling convention on i386 as well, and not only on x86-64, right?

> It's not impossible to do.  It won't be pretty, but that use of local
> enums allows to avoid unbearably long expansions.
> 
> Benefits:
> 	* all SyS... wrappers (i.e. the thing that really ought to
> go into syscall tables) have the same type.
> 	* we could have SYSCALL_DEFINE produce a trivial compat
> wrapper, have explicit COMPAT_SYSCALL_DEFINE discard that thing
> and populate the compat syscall table *entirely* with compat_SyS_...,
> letting the linker sort it out.  That way we don't need to keep
> track of what can use native and what needs compat in each compat
> table on biarch.
> 	* s390 compat wrappers would disappear with that approach.
> 	* we could even stop generating sys_... aliases - if
> syscall table is generated by slapping SyS_... or compat_SyS_...
> on the name given there, we don't need to _have_ those sys_...
> things at all.  All SyS_... would have the same type, so the pile
> in syscalls.h would not be needed - we could generate the externs
> at the same time we generate the syscall table.
> 
> And yes, it's a high-squick approach.  I know and I'm not saying
> it's a good idea.  OTOH, to quote the motto of philosophers and
> shell game operators, "there's something in it"...

... and getting rid of all in-kernel calls to sys_*() is needed as
groundwork for that. So I'll continue to do that "mindless" conversion
first. On top of that, three things (which are mostly orthogonal to each
other) can be done:

1) ptregs system call conversion for x86-64

   Original implementation by Linus exists; needs a bit of tweaking
   but should be doable soon. Need to double-check it does the right
   thing for IA32_EMULATION, though.

2) re-work initramfs etc. code to not use in-kernel equivalents of
   syscalls, but operate on the VFS level instead.

3) re-work SYSCALL_DEFINEx() / COMPAT_SYSCALL_DEFINEx() based on
   your suggestions.

Does that sound sensible?

Thanks,
	Dominik
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-s390" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux