>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(kvm_ap_enable_ie_mode); >>> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h >>> index 1b5621f..3142541 100644 >>> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h >>> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h >>> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ >>> #include <asm/facility.h> >>> #include <asm/processor.h> >>> #include <asm/sclp.h> >>> +#include <asm/ap.h> >>> >>> /* Transactional Memory Execution related macros */ >>> #define IS_TE_ENABLED(vcpu) ((vcpu->arch.sie_block->ecb & ECB_TE)) >>> >> What about VSIE? > That is a good question. I'm beginning to think introducing AP on second > level guests > ought to be postponed for now. I'm going to look into this further. >> Once you provide AP support to the guest, vSIE also has to be in place. But don't worry about vSIE, I think I know what we have to do. -- Thanks, David / dhildenb -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-s390" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html