Re: [PATCH] net: iucv: Free memory obtained by kzalloc

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On Wednesday 28 February 2018 05:26 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Wed, 28 Feb 2018 17:14:55 +0530
Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Wednesday 28 February 2018 04:00 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Wed, 28 Feb 2018 15:24:16 +0530
Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Free memory, if afiucv_iucv_init is not successful and
removing a IUCV driver.

Signed-off-by: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@xxxxxxxxx>
---
   net/iucv/af_iucv.c | 5 ++++-
   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/iucv/af_iucv.c b/net/iucv/af_iucv.c
index 1e8cc7b..eb0995a 100644
--- a/net/iucv/af_iucv.c
+++ b/net/iucv/af_iucv.c
@@ -2433,9 +2433,11 @@ static int afiucv_iucv_init(void)
   	af_iucv_dev->driver = &af_iucv_driver;
   	err = device_register(af_iucv_dev);
   	if (err)
-		goto out_driver;
+		goto out_iucv_dev;
   	return 0;
+out_iucv_dev:
+	kfree(af_iucv_dev);
   out_driver:
   	driver_unregister(&af_iucv_driver);
   out_iucv:
@@ -2496,6 +2498,7 @@ static void __exit afiucv_exit(void)
   {
   	if (pr_iucv) {
   		device_unregister(af_iucv_dev);
+		kfree(af_iucv_dev);
   		driver_unregister(&af_iucv_driver);
   		pr_iucv->iucv_unregister(&af_iucv_handler, 0);
   		symbol_put(iucv_if);
No, you must not use kfree() after you called device_register() (even
if it was not successful!) -- see the comment for device_register().
Yes, Your are right. First we need to call put_device() then kfree().
I will send updated patch.
No, that's not correct, either. device_register() will give up any
reference it obtained, and the caller did not obtain any additional
reference, so a put_device() would be wrong. A kfree() on a refcounted
structure is wrong as well.
If you will see the comment for device_register() (drivers/base/core.c)
there is mentioned that
'NOTE: _Never_ directly free @dev after calling this function, even
if it returned an error! Always use put_device() to give up the
reference initialized in this function instead.'
But as per you comment. we should not use.
Thanks,
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-s390" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux