Hi Dave Hi AKASHI On Mon, 26 Feb 2018 10:21:02 +0900 AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Arch code need arch maintainer to review, maybe either of you can send > > the common part first before the arch code, eg. AKASHI can split the common > > cleanup patches and post them as a separate series, after these prep > > series are reviewed then other patches can be refreshed based on it. > > > > Seems in AKASHI's series, only patch 2, 3 ,4 ,5 is needed if split out > > as a common change series. > > Yeah, all of those are touching kernel/kexec_file.c and in turn > they can conflict if being applied with 390 patches, but none of changes > that I made on kexec_file.c are overlapped with Phillips', I suppose > that merging these two patch sets is rather straightforward. > > @Phillips: I hope that your patch#14 and #17 be aligned with my patch#3 > as it is factoring out arch_kexec_{image_probe, image_load, verify_sig}() > and arch_kimage_file_post_load_cleanup(). Splitting the common code patches from the series is totally fine with me. On Friday I managed to get my code working with AKASHI's patches. After setting ARCH_HAS_PURGATORY and cleaning up the kexec_* functions it worked basically out of the box. However there is one problem with older compilers on s390. Please see my comment on patch #3 for details. Thanks Philipp -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-s390" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html