On Fri, 23 Feb 2018 08:11:42 +0000
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> We want to count IO exit requests in kvm_stat. At the same time
> we can get rid of the handle_noop function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 1 +
> arch/s390/kvm/intercept.c | 19 +++++--------------
> arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/intercept.c b/arch/s390/kvm/intercept.c
> index 07c6e81163bf..cad2ea216007 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/intercept.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/intercept.c
> @@ -50,18 +50,6 @@ u8 kvm_s390_get_ilen(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> return ilen;
> }
>
> -static int handle_noop(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> -{
> - switch (vcpu->arch.sie_block->icptcode) {
> - case 0x10:
> - vcpu->stat.exit_external_request++;
> - break;
> - default:
> - break; /* nothing */
> - }
> - return 0;
> -}
> -
> static int handle_stop(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> struct kvm_s390_local_interrupt *li = &vcpu->arch.local_int;
> @@ -458,15 +446,18 @@ static int handle_operexc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>
> int kvm_handle_sie_intercept(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> - int rc, per_rc = 0;
> + int rc = 0, per_rc = 0;
>
> if (kvm_is_ucontrol(vcpu->kvm))
> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>
> switch (vcpu->arch.sie_block->icptcode) {
> case ICPT_EXTREQ:
> + vcpu->stat.exit_external_request++;
> + break;
> case ICPT_IOREQ:
> - return handle_noop(vcpu);
> + vcpu->stat.exit_io_request++;
> + break;
> case ICPT_INST:
> rc = handle_instruction(vcpu);
> break;
This also enables PER processing for those intercepts, doesn't it? Or
is that not applicable in these cases anyway?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-s390" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
