On 01/17/2018 07:41 AM, Jiri Kosina wrote: > On Wed, 17 Jan 2018, Martin Schwidefsky wrote: > >> Implement nospec_load() and nospec_ptr() for s390 with the new >> gmb() barrier between the boundary condition and the load that >> may not be done speculatively. Thanks for the patches, Martin et al. I tested various earlier versions and will run these latest ones through some tests and add a tested by. > FWIW the naming seems to be changing constantly. The latest patchset from > Dan Williams [1] uses ifence_...(). > > [1] lkml.kernel.org/r/151586744180.5820.13215059696964205856.stgit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx This is getting a little silly. Not to bikeshed this to death, but obviously gmb (what was that ever supposed to stand for, global?) was the wrong name. We favored seb (speculative execution barrier), etc. Still, "ifence"? What is that supposed to mean? That sounds very architecture specific vs. what we're actually trying to ensure, which is that we don't speculatively load a pointer. Jon. -- Computer Architect | Sent from my Fedora powered laptop -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-s390" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
