Re: [PATCH 10/33] arm64: don't override dma_max_pfn

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/01/18 08:00, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
The generic version now takes dma_pfn_offset into account, so there is no
more need for an architecture override.

Reviewed-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@xxxxxxx>

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
---
  arch/arm64/include/asm/dma-mapping.h | 9 ---------
  1 file changed, 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/dma-mapping.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/dma-mapping.h
index 0df756b24863..eada887a93bf 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/dma-mapping.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/dma-mapping.h
@@ -76,14 +76,5 @@ static inline void dma_mark_clean(void *addr, size_t size)
  {
  }
-/* Override for dma_max_pfn() */
-static inline unsigned long dma_max_pfn(struct device *dev)
-{
-	dma_addr_t dma_max = (dma_addr_t)*dev->dma_mask;
-
-	return (ulong)dma_to_phys(dev, dma_max) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
-}
-#define dma_max_pfn(dev) dma_max_pfn(dev)
-
  #endif	/* __KERNEL__ */
  #endif	/* __ASM_DMA_MAPPING_H */

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-s390" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux