On Fri, Jan 05, 2018 at 06:01:33PM +0000, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > On 5 January 2018 at 17:58, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 08:05:46PM +0000, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > >> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/jump_label.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/jump_label.h > >> index e12d7d096fc0..7b05b404063a 100644 > >> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/jump_label.h > >> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/jump_label.h > >> @@ -45,5 +45,32 @@ struct jump_entry { > >> jump_label_t key; > >> }; > >> > >> +static inline jump_label_t jump_entry_code(const struct jump_entry *entry) > >> +{ > >> + return entry->code; > >> +} > >> + > >> +static inline struct static_key *jump_entry_key(const struct jump_entry *entry) > >> +{ > >> + return (struct static_key *)((unsigned long)entry->key & ~1UL); > >> +} > >> + > >> +static inline bool jump_entry_is_branch(const struct jump_entry *entry) > >> +{ > >> + return (unsigned long)entry->key & 1UL; > >> +} > >> + > >> +static inline bool jump_entry_is_module_init(const struct jump_entry *entry) > >> +{ > >> + return entry->code == 0; > >> +} > >> + > >> +static inline void jump_entry_set_module_init(struct jump_entry *entry) > >> +{ > >> + entry->code = 0; > >> +} > >> + > >> +#define jump_label_swap NULL > > > > Is there any difference between these functions on any of the > > architectures touched? Even with the relative offset, arm64 and x86 > > looked the same to me (well, I may have missed some detail). > > No, the latter two are identical everywhere, and the others are the > same modulo absolute vs relative. > > The issue is that the struct definition is per-arch so the accessors > should be as well. Up to this patch, even the jump_entry structure is the same on all architectures (the jump_label_t type differs). With relative offset, can you not just define jump_label_t to s32? At a quick grep in mainline, it doesn't seem to be used outside the structure definition. > Perhaps I should introduce two variants two asm-generic, similar to > how we have different flavors of unaligned accessors. You could as well define them directly in kernel/jump_label.h or, if used outside this file, include/linux/jump_label.h. -- Catalin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-s390" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html