Missing patch description explaining why this change is desirable.
On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 9:18 AM, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> wrote:
> --- a/lib/dma-direct.c
> +++ b/lib/dma-direct.c
> @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ static void *dma_direct_alloc(struct device *dev, size_t size,
> if (gfpflags_allow_blocking(gfp))
> page = dma_alloc_from_contiguous(dev, count, page_order, gfp);
> if (!page)
> - page = alloc_pages(gfp, page_order);
> + page = alloc_pages_node(dev_to_node(dev), gfp, page_order);
> if (!page)
> return NULL;
>
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-s390" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
