Re: consolidate direct dma mapping and swiotlb support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 29/12/17 08:18, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Almost every architecture supports a direct dma mapping implementation,
> where no iommu is used and the device dma address is a 1:1 mapping to
> the physical address or has a simple linear offset.  Currently the
> code for this implementation is most duplicated over the architectures,
> and the duplicated again in the swiotlb code, and then duplicated again
> for special cases like the x86 memory encryption DMA ops.
> 
> This series takes the existing very simple dma-noop dma mapping
> implementation, enhances it with all the x86 features and quirks, and
> creates a common set of architecture hooks for it and the swiotlb code.
> 
> It then switches a large number of architectures to this generic
> direct map implement and the new generic swiotlb dma_map ops.
> 
> Note that for now this only handles architectures that do cache coherent
> DMA, but a similar consolidation for non-coherent architectures is in the
> work for later merge windows.

Is it available in your dma-mapping.git or somewhere else?

Cheers
Vladimir

> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-s390" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux