[PATCH net,stable] s390/qeth: fix error handling in checksum cmd callback

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Make sure to check both return code fields before processing the
response. Otherwise we risk operating on invalid data.

Fixes: c9475369bd2b ("s390/qeth: rework RX/TX checksum offload")
Signed-off-by: Julian Wiedmann <jwi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/s390/net/qeth_core_main.c | 9 ++++++++-
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/s390/net/qeth_core_main.c b/drivers/s390/net/qeth_core_main.c
index 6c815207f4f5..3614df68830f 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/net/qeth_core_main.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/net/qeth_core_main.c
@@ -5386,6 +5386,13 @@ int qeth_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(qeth_poll);
 
+static int qeth_setassparms_inspect_rc(struct qeth_ipa_cmd *cmd)
+{
+	if (!cmd->hdr.return_code)
+		cmd->hdr.return_code = cmd->data.setassparms.hdr.return_code;
+	return cmd->hdr.return_code;
+}
+
 int qeth_setassparms_cb(struct qeth_card *card,
 			struct qeth_reply *reply, unsigned long data)
 {
@@ -6242,7 +6249,7 @@ static int qeth_ipa_checksum_run_cmd_cb(struct qeth_card *card,
 				(struct qeth_checksum_cmd *)reply->param;
 
 	QETH_CARD_TEXT(card, 4, "chkdoccb");
-	if (cmd->hdr.return_code)
+	if (qeth_setassparms_inspect_rc(cmd))
 		return 0;
 
 	memset(chksum_cb, 0, sizeof(*chksum_cb));
-- 
2.13.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-s390" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux