[PATCH 4/5] KVM: s390: drop use of spin lock in __floating_irq_kick

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Michael Mueller <mimu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

It is not required to take to a lock to protect access to the cpuflags
of the local interrupt structure of a vcpu as the performed operation
is an atomic_or.

Signed-off-by: Michael Mueller <mimu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c | 2 --
 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c b/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
index 024ad8bcc516..818aa4248b0f 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
@@ -1569,7 +1569,6 @@ static void __floating_irq_kick(struct kvm *kvm, u64 type)
 
 	/* make the VCPU drop out of the SIE, or wake it up if sleeping */
 	li = &dst_vcpu->arch.local_int;
-	spin_lock(&li->lock);
 	switch (type) {
 	case KVM_S390_MCHK:
 		atomic_or(CPUSTAT_STOP_INT, li->cpuflags);
@@ -1581,7 +1580,6 @@ static void __floating_irq_kick(struct kvm *kvm, u64 type)
 		atomic_or(CPUSTAT_EXT_INT, li->cpuflags);
 		break;
 	}
-	spin_unlock(&li->lock);
 	kvm_s390_vcpu_wakeup(dst_vcpu);
 }
 
-- 
2.13.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-s390" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux