On Fri, 8 Dec 2017 13:21:47 +0900
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I'll also escalate it to s390 people
>
> Martin, Heiko,
>
> we discovered a sort of build order dependency while working on a
> printk related patch set. we now have extra inclused in kallsyms.h,
> namely,
>
> #include <linux/mm.h>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> #include <asm/sections.h>
>
>
> and this gives us the following build warning:
>
> On (12/08/17 11:05), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> >
> > On (12/08/17 02:07), kbuild test robot wrote:
> > > All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
> > >
> > > In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/elf.h:141:0,
> > > from include/linux/elf.h:5,
> > > from include/linux/module.h:15,
> > > from include/linux/kallsyms.h:13,
> > > from kernel//sched/autogroup.c:6:
> > > >> arch/s390/include/asm/mmu_context.h:111:0: warning: "finish_arch_post_lock_switch" redefined
> > > #define finish_arch_post_lock_switch finish_arch_post_lock_switch
> > >
> > > In file included from kernel//sched/autogroup.c:2:0:
> > > kernel//sched/sched.h:1328:0: note: this is the location of the previous definition
> > > # define finish_arch_post_lock_switch() do { } while (0)
>
>
> any chance you can help us out?
Move the include of "sched.h" in autogroup.c after all the other
includes. For the #ifndef in sched.h to work the arch specific
definition in mmu_context.h needs to be seen first.
--
blue skies,
Martin.
"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-s390" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
