Re: [PATCH] s390/drivers: use setup_timer instead of init_timer

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/24/2017 01:50 PM, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Use setup_timer function instead of initializing timer with the
> function and data fields.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/s390/net/fsm.c | 4 +---
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/s390/net/fsm.c b/drivers/s390/net/fsm.c
> index 8c14c6c3ad3d..16b81be1f07a 100644
> --- a/drivers/s390/net/fsm.c
> +++ b/drivers/s390/net/fsm.c
> @@ -142,13 +142,11 @@ void
>  fsm_settimer(fsm_instance *fi, fsm_timer *this)
>  {
>  	this->fi = fi;
> -	this->tl.function = (void *)fsm_expire_timer;
> -	this->tl.data = (long)this;
>  #if FSM_TIMER_DEBUG
>  	printk(KERN_DEBUG "fsm(%s): Create timer %p\n", fi->name,
>  	       this);
>  #endif
> -	init_timer(&this->tl);
> +	setup_timer(&this->tl, (void *)fsm_expire_timer, (long)this);
>  }
> 
>  void
> 

Thanks Colin, but looks like Kees beat you to it in Linus' tree.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-s390" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux