Re: [RFC 00/19] KVM: s390/crypto/vfio: guest dedicated crypto adapters

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/16/2017 11:49 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Thu, 16 Nov 2017 10:23:25 -0500
Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On 11/14/2017 08:57 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Tue, 31 Oct 2017 15:39:09 -0400
Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 10/13/2017 01:38 PM, Tony Krowiak wrote:
Ping
Tony Krowiak (19):
     KVM: s390: SIE considerations for AP Queue virtualization
     KVM: s390: refactor crypto initialization
     s390/zcrypt: new AP matrix bus
     s390/zcrypt: create an AP matrix device on the AP matrix bus
     s390/zcrypt: base implementation of AP matrix device driver
     s390/zcrypt: register matrix device with VFIO mediated device
       framework
     KVM: s390: introduce AP matrix configuration interface
     s390/zcrypt: support for assigning adapters to matrix mdev
     s390/zcrypt: validate adapter assignment
     s390/zcrypt: sysfs interfaces supporting AP domain assignment
     s390/zcrypt: validate domain assignment
     s390/zcrypt: sysfs support for control domain assignment
     s390/zcrypt: validate control domain assignment
     KVM: s390: Connect the AP mediated matrix device to KVM
     s390/zcrypt: introduce ioctl access to VFIO AP Matrix driver
     KVM: s390: interface to configure KVM guest's AP matrix
     KVM: s390: validate input to AP matrix config interface
     KVM: s390: New ioctl to configure KVM guest's AP matrix
     s390/facilities: enable AP facilities needed by guest
I think the approach is fine, and the code also looks fine for the most
part. Some comments:

- various patches can be squashed together to give a better
    understanding at a glance
Which patches would you squash?
See the patches. As a rule, I find it more sensible to introduce
interface + implementation together rather than separate.
The only patch that introduces an interface separate from the implementation
is patch7:

	KVM: s390: introduce AP matrix configuration interface

I've squashed that with patch8, s390/zcrypt: support for assigning adapters to matrix mdev


- this needs documentation (as I already said)
My plan is to take the cover letter patch and incorporate that into
documentation,
then replace the cover letter patch with a more concise summary.
Sounds good.

- some of the driver/device modelling feels a bit awkward (commented in
    patches) -- I'm not sure that my proposal is better, but I think we
    should make sure the interdependencies are modeled correctly
I am responding to each patch review individually.
- some minor stuff


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-s390" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux