On Wed, 8 Nov 2017 19:12:25 +0100 Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 11/08/2017 05:59 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > Virtio UAPI headers aren't just for UAPI, it's for guests/hypervisors as > > well. The s390 ones need to be BSD as well. > > > > Fixes: e2be04c7f995 ("License cleanup: add SPDX license identifier to uapi header files with a license") > > Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > > > since v1: > > drop an extra comment chunk, reported by Cornelia > > > > arch/s390/include/uapi/asm/kvm_virtio.h | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++++++- > > FWIW, this file will go away anyway. > Looks like the following commit in the s390 feature branch > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/s390/linux.git/commit/drivers/s390/virtio/Makefile?h=features&id=7fb2b2d512448cf0e914c4647a1cf02b52263702 > missed this file. Can we simply rip this out? > > > Regarding the virtio-ccw.h headers it is probably something that happened by accident. > Back then Rusty (as an IBMer) proposed to change all virtio headers to BSD licence. ISTR that the relicensing already went through... is that not the case? I thought this was just a fixup to align with reality? > > > arch/s390/include/uapi/asm/virtio-ccw.h | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++++++- > > 2 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-s390" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html