In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. Notice that in this particular case I placed the "fall through" comment on its own line, which is what GCC is expecting to find. Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsilva@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- Changes in v2: Move the "fall through" comment on its own line above the rest of the sentence. net/smc/smc_close.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/net/smc/smc_close.c b/net/smc/smc_close.c index f0d16fb..a6c6559 100644 --- a/net/smc/smc_close.c +++ b/net/smc/smc_close.c @@ -360,7 +360,8 @@ static void smc_close_passive_work(struct work_struct *work) case SMC_PEERCLOSEWAIT1: if (rxflags->peer_done_writing) sk->sk_state = SMC_PEERCLOSEWAIT2; - /* fall through to check for closing */ + /* fall through */ + /* to check for closing */ case SMC_PEERCLOSEWAIT2: case SMC_PEERFINCLOSEWAIT: if (!smc_cdc_rxed_any_close(&smc->conn)) -- 2.7.4 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-s390" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
