On Tue, 17 Oct 2017 10:58:47 +0200 Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, 16 Oct 2017 16:43:25 -0700 > Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > In preparation for unconditionally passing the struct timer_list > > pointer to all timer callbacks, switch to using the new timer_setup() > > and from_timer() to pass the timer pointer explicitly. > > > > Cc: Sebastian Ott <sebott@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: linux-s390@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/s390/cio/device.c | 8 ++++---- > > drivers/s390/cio/device.h | 2 ++ > > drivers/s390/cio/device_fsm.c | 10 ++++------ > > drivers/s390/cio/eadm_sch.c | 9 ++++----- > > 4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) > > Applied to s390/linux:feature branch. Thanks. On second though, this will be postponed until the first merge of the s390/linux tree in 4.15 merge window has been done. I do not want to rebase the features branch and without the base timer code the branch will not compile. But be assured the patch is accepted and queued, just not visible yet. -- blue skies, Martin. "Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-s390" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
