Re: [PATCH v8 10/11] arm64/kasan: explicitly zero kasan shadow memory

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 06:35:16PM -0400, Pavel Tatashin wrote:
> To optimize the performance of struct page initialization,
> vmemmap_populate() will no longer zero memory.
> 
> We must explicitly zero the memory that is allocated by vmemmap_populate()
> for kasan, as this memory does not go through struct page initialization
> path.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Steven Sistare <steven.sistare@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Bob Picco <bob.picco@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/mm/kasan_init.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 42 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/kasan_init.c b/arch/arm64/mm/kasan_init.c
> index 81f03959a4ab..e78a9ecbb687 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/kasan_init.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/kasan_init.c
> @@ -135,6 +135,41 @@ static void __init clear_pgds(unsigned long start,
>  		set_pgd(pgd_offset_k(start), __pgd(0));
>  }
>  
> +/*
> + * Memory that was allocated by vmemmap_populate is not zeroed, so we must
> + * zero it here explicitly.
> + */
> +static void
> +zero_vmemmap_populated_memory(void)
> +{
> +	struct memblock_region *reg;
> +	u64 start, end;
> +
> +	for_each_memblock(memory, reg) {
> +		start = __phys_to_virt(reg->base);
> +		end = __phys_to_virt(reg->base + reg->size);
> +
> +		if (start >= end)
> +			break;
> +
> +		start = (u64)kasan_mem_to_shadow((void *)start);
> +		end = (u64)kasan_mem_to_shadow((void *)end);
> +
> +		/* Round to the start end of the mapped pages */
> +		start = round_down(start, SWAPPER_BLOCK_SIZE);
> +		end = round_up(end, SWAPPER_BLOCK_SIZE);
> +		memset((void *)start, 0, end - start);
> +	}
> +
> +	start = (u64)kasan_mem_to_shadow(_text);
> +	end = (u64)kasan_mem_to_shadow(_end);
> +
> +	/* Round to the start end of the mapped pages */
> +	start = round_down(start, SWAPPER_BLOCK_SIZE);
> +	end = round_up(end, SWAPPER_BLOCK_SIZE);
> +	memset((void *)start, 0, end - start);
> +}

I really don't see the need to duplicate the existing logic to iterate over
memblocks, calculate the addresses, etc.

Why can't we just have a zeroing wrapper? e.g. something like the below.

I really don't see why we couldn't have a generic function in core code to do
this, even if vmemmap_populate() doesn't.

Thanks,
Mark.

---->8----
diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/kasan_init.c b/arch/arm64/mm/kasan_init.c
index 81f0395..698d065 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/mm/kasan_init.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/mm/kasan_init.c
@@ -135,6 +135,17 @@ static void __init clear_pgds(unsigned long start,
                set_pgd(pgd_offset_k(start), __pgd(0));
 }
 
+void kasan_populate_shadow(unsigned long shadow_start, unsigned long shadow_end,
+                          nid_t nid)
+{
+       shadow_start = round_down(shadow_start, SWAPPER_BLOCK_SIZE);
+       shadow_end = round_up(shadow_end, SWAPPER_BLOCK_SIZE);
+
+       vmemmap_populate(shadow_start, shadow_end, nid);
+
+       memset((void *)shadow_start, 0, shadow_end - shadow_start);
+}
+
 void __init kasan_init(void)
 {
        u64 kimg_shadow_start, kimg_shadow_end;
@@ -161,8 +172,8 @@ void __init kasan_init(void)
 
        clear_pgds(KASAN_SHADOW_START, KASAN_SHADOW_END);
 
-       vmemmap_populate(kimg_shadow_start, kimg_shadow_end,
-                        pfn_to_nid(virt_to_pfn(lm_alias(_text))));
+       kasah_populate_shadow(kimg_shadow_start, kimg_shadow_end,
+                             pfn_to_nid(virt_to_pfn(lm_alias(_text))));
 
        /*
         * vmemmap_populate() has populated the shadow region that covers the
@@ -191,9 +202,9 @@ void __init kasan_init(void)
                if (start >= end)
                        break;
 
-               vmemmap_populate((unsigned long)kasan_mem_to_shadow(start),
-                               (unsigned long)kasan_mem_to_shadow(end),
-                               pfn_to_nid(virt_to_pfn(start)));
+               kasan_populate_shadow((unsigned long)kasan_mem_to_shadow(start),
+                                     (unsigned long)kasan_mem_to_shadow(end),
+                                     pfn_to_nid(virt_to_pfn(start)));
        }
 
        /*
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-s390" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux